摘要
肝细胞癌(HCC)是全球最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,是导致肿瘤相关死亡的重要原因。 尽管目前针对 HCC 的治疗手
段众多,包括手术切除、经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)、消融治疗、肝移植和药物治疗等,已经很大程度上地改善了患者的生
存情况,但相同分期且接受相同治疗的患者对治疗的反应及预后有很大差异,这不仅与肿瘤本身的异质性有关系,还与患者
机体不同的体力状态、营养状态及对治疗耐受性的差异密切相关。 肌肉减少症是影响 HCC 患者生存的独立预测因子,而骨骼
肌的定量测量是肌肉减少症诊断和评价其严重程度的关键因素,影像学测量技术也飞速发展,大大提高了评估的精准性,对
临床决策更具指导意义,成为了新的研究热点。 因此,本文将对 HCC 患者肌肉减少症的影像学测量的研究进展做一总结,并
探讨其在 HCC 预后评价中发挥的作用。
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma HCC is one of the most common malignancy tumors worldwide and an important reason of
cancer-related death. Various options for HCC treatment including surgery resection transcatheter arterial chemoembolization TACE ablation therapy liver transplantation and drug therapy have greatly improved the survival of patients. However the patients
with the same stage and the same treatment have a great difference in response to treatment and prognosis. It is not only related to the
heterogeneity of the tumor itself but also closely related to the different physical state nutrition status and tolerance to treatment of
patients. In recent years multiple studies have shown that sarcopenia is an independent predictor of survival in HCC patients and the
quantitative measurement of skeletal muscle is a key factor in the diagnosis of sarcopenia and the evaluation of its severity. Moreover
the rapid development of imaging measurement technology has greatly improved the accuracy of evaluation and has more guiding
significance for clinical decision-making which has become a new research focus. Therefore this review will summarize the research
progress of imaging measurement of sarcopenia in HCC patients and explore their roles in the prognostic evaluation of HCC.
关键词
肌肉减少症 /
肝细胞癌 /
影像学测量 /
预后
Key words
Sarcopenia /
Hepatocellular carcinoma /
Imaging measurement /
Prognosis
1冬 冬, 2李 玉, 2王楠娅.
肌肉减少症影像学测量在肝细胞癌预后评价中的应用[J]. 肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志. 2022, 9(4): 438-444
1Dong Dong,2Li Yu,2Wang Nanya.
Application of sarcopenia imaging measurement in prognosis evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Electronic Journal of Metabolism and Nutrition of Cancer. 2022, 9(4): 438-444
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}