免疫-炎症及二聚化蛋白特征对非小细胞肺癌患者化疗联合热疗预后预测价值

邓洁, 马燕凌, 李黎

肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 73-82.

PDF(1922 KB)
PDF(1922 KB)
肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 73-82. DOI: 10.16689/j.cnki.cn11-9349/r.2026.01.011
论著

免疫-炎症及二聚化蛋白特征对非小细胞肺癌患者化疗联合热疗预后预测价值

  • 邓洁, 马燕凌, 李黎
作者信息 +

Prognostic of immune-inflammatory markers and the MGA signature in predicting outcomes for NSCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy combined with hyperthermia

  • Deng Jie, Ma Yanling, Li Li
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者泛免疫炎症指数(PIV)、T细胞亚群比例及MAX二聚化蛋白(MGA)基因突变特征及对接受化疗联合局部热疗临床转归预测价值。方法 选取2020年4月至2024年4月江汉大学附属湖北省第三人民医院收治的332例NSCLC患者,所有患者均接受含铂双药化疗方案联合局部热疗,共进行4~6个周期的联合治疗。依据患者启动治疗后1年内的临床转归情况分为存活组和死亡组。对比两组患者的一般临床资料、NSCLC病理特征及治疗特征、外周血炎症指标、T细胞亚群比例、MGA基因突变情况,采用Logistic回归模型分析患者不良临床转归的危险因素,绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析各危险因素独立及联合预测患者不良临床转归的临床价值。结果 入组患者中1年内死亡201例(60.5%)。死亡组年龄、合并糖尿病、肿瘤直径、非鳞癌患者、低分化患者、Ⅳ期患者、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、系统免疫炎症指数(SII)、PIV、CD8+T细胞、MGA基因突变阳性均高于存活组患者,化疗周期数、CD4+细胞、CD4+/CD8+比值低于存活组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析表明PIV、CD4+T细胞、CD4+/CD8+比值、MGA基因突变阳性均与患者不良临床转归相关(P<0.05)。上述4种指标独立及联合预测患者临床转归不良结局的AUC值分别为0.642、0.607、0.625、0.572、0.788。校准曲线提示模型拟合度良好、决策曲线显示阈值概率0~90%内模型预测净获益>0。结论 PIV、CD4+细胞比例、CD4+/CD8+比值、MGA基因突变阳性均与接受化疗联合局部热疗的NSCLC患者不良临床转归相关,联合应用对于预测患者治疗预后具有较高的临床价值。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the characteristics of pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), T cell subset proportions, and MAX dimerization protein (MGA) gene mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as well as their predictive value for the clinical outcomes of patients receiving chemotherapy combined with local hyperthermia. Method A total of 332 NSCLC patients admitted to Hubei Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Jianghan University from April 2020 to April 2024 were selected. All patients received a platinum-based dual-drug chemotherapy regimen combined with local hyperthermia, with a total of 4 to 6 cycles of combined treatment. Based on the clinical outcomes within 1 year after the initiation of treatment, the patients were divided into the survival group and the death group. General clinical data, pathological characteristics of NSCLC, treatment characteristics, peripheral blood inflammatory indicators, T cell subset proportions, and MGA gene mutation status were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for adverse clinical outcomes in patients, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to analyze the clinical value of each risk factor in predicting adverse clinical outcomes independently and in combination. Result Among the enrolled patients, 201 (60.5%) died within one year. Compared with the survival group, the death group had higher values in terms of age, proportion of patients complicated with diabetes mellitus, tumor diameter, proportion of non-squamous cell carcinoma patients, proportion of patients with poor differentiation, proportion of stage Ⅳ patients, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), PIV, CD8+T cell count, and proportion of positive MGA gene mutations, while lower values in the number of chemotherapy cycles, CD4+T cell count, and CD4+T cell/CD8+T cell ratio (all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that PIV, CD4+T cell count, CD4+T cell/CD8+T cell ratio, and positive MGA gene mutation were all associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients (all P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values of these four indicators for predicting adverse clinical outcomes independently and in combination were 0.642, 0.607, 0.625, 0.572, and 0.788, respectively. The calibration curve indicated that the model had a good degree of fit, and the decision curve showed that the model had a net benefit > 0 within the threshold probability range of 0-90%. Conclusion PIV, CD4+T cell proportion, CD4+/CD8+ratio, and positive MGA gene mutation are all associated with adverse clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy combined with local hyperthermia. The combined application of these indicators has high clinical value for predicting the treatment prognosis of patients.

关键词

非小细胞肺癌 / 化疗 / 局部热疗 / 联合治疗 / 泛免疫炎症指数 / T细胞亚群比例 / MAX二聚化蛋白基因 / 临床转归

Key words

Non-small cell lung cancer / Chemotherapy / Local hyperthermia / Combined therapy / Pan-immune-inflammation value / T cell subset proportion / MAX dimerization protein gene / Clinical outcome

引用本文

导出引用
邓洁, 马燕凌, 李黎. 免疫-炎症及二聚化蛋白特征对非小细胞肺癌患者化疗联合热疗预后预测价值[J]. 肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志. 2026, 13(1): 73-82 https://doi.org/10.16689/j.cnki.cn11-9349/r.2026.01.011
Deng Jie, Ma Yanling, Li Li. Prognostic of immune-inflammatory markers and the MGA signature in predicting outcomes for NSCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy combined with hyperthermia[J]. Electronic Journal of Metabolism and Nutrition of Cancer. 2026, 13(1): 73-82 https://doi.org/10.16689/j.cnki.cn11-9349/r.2026.01.011

参考文献

[1] 王家乐,邱天羽,崔亚男,等. 2024 CSCO非小细胞肺癌指南(晚期部分)解读[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版),2024,45(4):465-470.
[2] CHEN P, LIU Y, WEN Y, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer in China[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2022,42(10):937-970.
[3] 栾涛,沈盼晓,张云辉,等. 晚期非小细胞肺癌治疗年度进展2024[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2025,48(1):72-77.
[4] WANG T, ZHANG L, CHENG Y. Clinical status and perspective on the application of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a review[J]. Chin Clin Oncol, 2024, 13(2):26.
[5] HEO J, JO Y, YOON M. Synergistic effects of combined hyperthermia and electric fields treatment in non-small cell lung-cancer (NSCLC) cell lines[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2025, 27(5):2014-2023.
[6] 刘威,张帆,龙永贵. 热疗通过靶向HOXB1诱导非小细胞肺癌细胞凋亡的研究[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2022,43(24):3037-3042.
[7] 肖敬,李超,张淑平,等. 深部热疗联合信迪利单抗及nab-PC方案治疗驱动基因阴性、PD-L1表达阳性晚期鳞状非小细胞肺癌效果及安全性[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床,2024,36(1):24-31.
[8] YANG H, LI M, MEI T. Survival benefit of thermal ablation combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2022,39(1):348-357.
[9] ZHOU Y, ZHONG Q, HUANG D, et al. The efficacy of adding hyperthermia to the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients based on the states of EGFR[J]. Aging (Albany NY), 2022, 14(12):5223-5232.
[10] 范志鹏,余静,胡静,等. 炎症标志物的变化趋势对一线接受免疫联合化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的预测价值[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志,2024,51(5):257-266.
[11] WANG QY, ZHONG WT, XIAO Y, et al. Pan-immune-inflammation value as a prognostic biomarker for colon cancer and its variation by primary tumor location[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2024,30(33):3823-3836.
[12] BIZZARRI FP, CAMPETELLA M, RUSSO P, et al. Prognostic value of PLR, SIRI, PIV, SII, and NLR in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: can inflammatory factors influence pathogenesis and outcomes[J] ?. Cancers (Basel), 2025,17(13):2189.
[13] CEYLAN A, ARTAC M, KOCAK M Z, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor and programmed cell death-1 expression levels in peripheral T cell subsets of patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Scand J Immunol, 2024, 100(4):e13398.
[14] KANG JH, ZAPPASODI R. Modulating treg stability to improve cancer immunotherapy[J]. Trends Cancer,2023,9(11):911-927.
[15] 吕黎阳,聂玉玲,热那古力·阿不来提,等. 基于二代测序技术的年轻弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的基因突变谱和预后分析[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志,2023,31(2):403-410.
[16] TANASKOVIC N, DALSASS M, FILIPUZZI M, et al. Polycomb group ring finger protein 6 suppresses Myc-induced lymphomagenesis[J]. Life Sci Alliance, 2022,5(8):e202101344.
[17] 中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会,中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会,中国抗癌协会放射治疗专业委员会,等. 中国非小细胞肺癌放射治疗临床指南(2020版)[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2020,29(8):599-607.
[18] HWANG J K, PAGE B J, FLYNN D, et al. Validation of the eighth edition TNM lung cancer staging system[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2020, 15(4):649-654.
[19] FREITES-MARTINEZ A, SANTANA N, ARIAS-SANTIAGO S, et al. Using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE-Version 5.0) to evaluate the severity of adverse events of anticancer therapies[J]. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed), 2021, 112(1):90-92.
[20] 李添翼,任粤,宋震亚,等. 泛免疫炎症指数在肿瘤预后疗效的研究进展[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2024,28(5):139-143.
[21] 张利改,唱凯,吴宇,等. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞亚群比值在非小细胞肺癌临床分期及病理分型中的应用价值研究[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2024,45(14):1675-1681,1686.
[22] 庄梦婷,崔俊杰,周菲,等. PNI和SII对TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗及酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗肝癌患者的预后评估[J]. 徐州医科大学学报,2024,44(10):725-732.
[23] 江美南,李添翼,任粤,等. 治疗前泛免疫炎症值预测食管癌术后辅助放疗患者预后的价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2024,28(17):1-8.
[24] 王夫浩,岳金波. 单细胞转录组解析CD4+T细胞在肿瘤微环境中的研究进展[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志,2024,31(15):950-957.
[25] 姜炜,马筑,李青松,等. 晚期非小细胞肺癌胸部放疗长期生存患者的临床特征及Nomogram预测模型构建[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志,2023,43(3):189-197.
[26] 李娜,李秀荣. 肿瘤微环境中与CD8+T细胞耗竭相关的分化及代谢重编程的研究进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2024,32(16):3130-3137.
[27] 吕志芳,王明,程飞飞,等. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞CD4+/CD8+与PD-1抑制剂免疫治疗肺癌疗效及OS的关系研究[J]. 河北医学,2024,30(9):1483-1488.
[28] LI T, HU Z, SONG F, et al. Photonic Hyperthermia Synergizes with Immune-Activators to Augment Tumor-Localized Immunotherapy[J]. Small Methods, 2023,7(5):e2300116.
[29] WANG S, JIAO W, YAN B, et al. Intracellular Magnetic Hyperthermia Enables Concurrent Down-Regulation of CD47 and SIRPα To Potentiate Antitumor Immunity[J]. Nano Lett, 2024,24(9):2894-2903.
[30] MCGIVERN B, MORROW MM, TORTI E, et al. MGA-related syndrome: a proposed novel disorder[J]. HGG Adv, 2025,6(1):100387.
[31] TANG S, GUO T, SONG C, et al. MGA loss-of-function variants cause premature ovarian insufficiency[J]. J Clin Invest, 2024,134(22):e183758.
[32] 董兵,刘晓隗,冯攀,等. DNA甲基转移酶3A、MAX基因关联蛋白A、磷酯酰肌醇-3激酶催化亚基γ基因基因突变与老年非小细胞肺癌患者预后的关系[J]. 中华实验外科杂志,2020,37(10):1904-1906.
[33] THOMAS ME 3RD, QI W, WALSH MP, et al. Functional characterization of cooperating MGA mutations in RUNX1::RUNX1T1 acute myeloid leukemia[J]. Leukemia, 2024,38(5):991-1002.
[34] MATHSYARAJA H, CATCHPOLE J, FREIE B, et al. Loss of MGA repression mediated by an atypical polycomb complex promotes tumor progression and invasiveness[J]. Elife, 2021,10:e64212.
[35] QU Y, WANG C, LIU L, et al. Predictive Value of Max's Giant Associated Protein Mutation in Outcomes of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2021,9:728647.

PDF(1922 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/